Comparison between postmortem computed tomography and autopsy in the detection of traumatic head injuries

J Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;47(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy in detecting traumatic head injuries.

Materials and methods: Consecutive cases of death that underwent both unenhanced PMCT and conventional autopsy were collected from our institution database during a period of 3 years and reviewed retrospectively. PMCT images were reviewed for the presence of fractures (cranial vault, skull base, facial bones and atlas/axis) and intracranial hemorrhage. Kappa values were calculated to determine the agreement between PMCT and autopsy reports.

Results: 73 cases were included, of which 44 (60%) had head trauma. Agreement between PMCT and autopsy was almost perfect (κ = 0.95) for fractures and substantial (κ = 0.75) for intracranial hemorrhage. PMCT was superior to autopsy in detecting facial bone and upper cervical spine fractures, and intraventricular hemorrhage. However, in some cases thin extra-axial blood collections were missed on PMCT.

Conclusions: The agreement between PMCT and autopsy in detecting traumatic head injuries was good. Using a combination of both techniques increases the quality of postmortem evaluation because more lesions are detected.

Keywords: Autopsy; Fracture; Hemorrhage; Postmortem computed tomography; Traumatic head injuries.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Autopsy*
  • Brain Injuries, Traumatic / diagnosis*
  • Brain Injuries, Traumatic / pathology
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / diagnosis*
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuroradiography
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Young Adult